Page 2 of 7

Working Record : Drama

“Oh what a Lovely war” is a theatrical musical feature that was present in 1963 and latter, made into a film in 2006.

Part 1:

The original production was performed with the cast in Pierrot costumes and metal helmets due to Littlewood’s abhorrence of the color khaki and anti-war feelings. Behind them projected slides (operated by projectionist Tom Carr) showed images from the war and a moving display (what Littlewood called her “electronic newspaper” from having seen one in East Berlin on a railway bridge) across the full stage width with statistics, such as “Sept 25 . . . loss . . . British loss 8,236 men in 3 hours . . . German loss nil” and “Average life of a machine gunner under attack on the Western Front: 4 minutes”. These are figures that seem preposterous in the present day and perhaps even 10 times off what shouldn’t have been lost and could have most likely been prevented. The most responsible for the thousands of deaths had been the infamous, General Haig.

Haig was British commander on the Western Front for most of World War One. The huge casualties that his military strategy produced has made him a controversial figure.

Douglas Haig was born in Edinburgh on 19 June 1861 into a wealthy family who owned a whisky business. He studied at Oxford University and in 1884 went to the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst. He then served as a cavalry officer for nine years, mainly in India. He later took part in the Sudan campaign (1897 – 1898) and the Boer War (1899 – 1902). In 1906, Haig went to the War Office as director of military training. His responsibilities included the organisation of a British Expeditionary Force (BEF) for deployment in the event of war with Germany. On the outbreak of war in 1914, Haig was commanding the BEF’s 1st Army Corps, whose overall commander was Sir John French. By the end of 1915, it was clear that French was ill-suited to the role, and in December Haig was appointed commander in chief in his place.

In an attempt to break the stalemate on the Western Front and relieve the pressure on the French at Verdun, Haig ordered the Somme offensive, which began on 1 July 1916. The British army suffered 60,000 casualties (just under 20,000 of whom were killed) on the first day, the highest in its history, and Haig’s conduct of the battle made him one of the most controversial figures of the war. In July 1917, a new offensive – the Third Battle of Ypres (also known as Passchendaele) resulted in further heavy casualties, but did succeed in weakening the German army and helped prepare the way for its defeat in 1918.

Haig believed that the war could only be won on the Western Front. This caused friction with Lloyd George, secretary of state for war and prime minister from December 1916 who disagreed with this strategy, supported alternative schemes and intrigued against Haig. The great German attacks of the spring of 1918 almost broke the British army, but inspired the creation of a single command of allied forces on the Western Front under the French commander Ferdinand Foch, strongly supported by Haig. Between August and November 1918 the Allied forces under Haig’s command achieved a series of victories against the German army which resulted in the end of the war.

Haig served as commander in chief of British Home Forces from 1918 until his retirement in 1921. He also helped establish the Royal British Legion and worked hard to raise funds for it. He was created an earl in 1919 and died on 28 January 1928.

war pictures      Dramatic picture of soldiers charging into battle.

Not all that are responsible for the many deaths are directly affiliated with the military. Some come in the form of Ammunition companies that had profited during the wars by simply funding them. These companies had made millions from manufacturing ammunition and rifles to other sorts of equipment that could be sold in order to profit.

Wherever there is a war, look for CIA/IMF/private military war profiteers covertly funding and supporting both of the sides in order to keep the wars raging and the profits rolling in. As former CIA Station Chief John Stockwell explained: “Enemies are necessary for the wheels of the US military machine to turn.” The US had even supported Afghanistan by funding Taliban.

On June 7, Afghanistan became America’s longest-ever war, a source had reported on an ongoing investigation in-order to prove that private security companies are using American dollars to bribe the Taliban. Fueling combat and thus enhancing demand for their services. The news follows a “series of events last month that had suggested all-out collusion with the insurgents.

“The American people are paying to prop up a corrupt government that may be using our money to pay private companies to drum up business by paying the insurgents to attack our troops”, Kucinich said…. The Times interviewed a NATO official in Kabul who “believed millions of dollars were making their way to the Taliban.”

These companies cover up operations like these with almost a false presentation:

Halliburton is an example of this,

With approximately 65,000 employees, representing 140 nationalities in over 80 countries, Halliburton is one of the world’s largest providers of products and services to the global energy industry such as weapons etc. The Company has corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Halliburton serves the upstream oil and natural gas industry throughout the life cycle of the reservoir – from locating hydrocarbons and managing geological data, to drilling and formation evaluation, well construction and completion, and optimizing production throughout the life of the field.

Weapons [wepuh n]

Noun : 1. instrument or device for use in attack or defense in combat,fighting, or war, as a sword, rifle, or cannon.

2. Anything used against an opponent, adversary, or victim: the deadly weapon of satire.

3.Zoology. any part or organ serving for attack or defense, as claws,horns, teeth, or stings.

Verb (used with object) : 4. To supply or equip with a weapon or weapons: To weapon aircraft with heat-seeking missiles.

  • A) RIFLES: The standard rifle of the British army during World War I was the Lee-Enfield .303, a variation of a weapon that had been used by the army since 1902.
  • B) BARBED WIRE : As the trench system had finally been stabilized, the utilization of the barbed wire had stretched from the coast of France all the way to the coast of Switzerland. The trenches had reached a length of over 645 kilometers. Methods to protect the trenches from the enemy were always sought out. Thus meaning, both sides looked at using barbed wire in order to slow their enemies from getting into the trenches.As the world becomes more industrialized, before World War One, the mass production of barb-wire for cattle farms had been under way. The military use of barb wire had quickly been adapted by making the barbs longer and sharper. Millions of kilometers of barbed wire were laid down by both sides. In some cases, the barbed wire in front of a trench could be up to 30 to 40 meters wide.The only time it had been safe to lay the wire had been at night-time. Work parties of soldiers would be ordered to construct or repair barbed wire in front of the trench. This was a very scary job for the soldiers. They had to be very quiet so that the enemy would not think that they were launching an attack and begin shooting at them. Special construction equipment was developed by the men to limit the noise that occurred during construction. The highlighted statement indicates what the soldiers had been going through. (“very scary job for soldiers”) is an indication that there is a dominating occurrence of ‘Fear’.)

 

  •  C) MACHINE GUNS : The Machine guns had inflicted appalling casualties on both war fronts in World War One. Men who went over-the-top in trenches stood little chance when the enemy opened up with their machine guns. Machine guns were one of the main killers in the war and accounted for many thousands of deaths.Crude machine guns had first been used in the American Civil War (1861 to 1865). However, tactics from this war to 1914 had not changed to fit in with this new weapon. Machine guns could shoot hundreds of rounds of ammunition a minute and the standard military tactic of World War One was the infantry charge. Casualties were huge. Many soldiers barely got out of their trench before they were cut down.

 

  • D) ARTILLERY : Artillery consisted of the military’s heavy firearms. As a branch of the armed forces, its purpose was to fire explosive-filled projectiles across relatively large distances. In contrast to the infantry and the cavalry, the artillery could not enter into combat on its own. By the same token, other weapons required artillery support in order to be effective in battle.

 

  • E) POISON GAS : They were primarily used to demoralize, injure, and kill entrenched defenders, against whom the indiscriminate and generally very slow-moving or static nature of gas clouds would be most effective. The types of weapons employed ranged from disabling chemicals, such as tear gas and the severe mustard gas, to lethal agents like phosgene and chlorine. This chemical warfare was a major component of the first global war and first total war of the 20th century. The killing capacity of gas was limited, with four percent of combat deaths caused by gas. Gas was unlike most other weapons of the period because it was possible to develop effective countermeasures, such as gas masks. In the later stages of the war, as the use of gas increased, its overall effectiveness diminished. The widespread use of these agents of chemical warfare, and wartime advances in the composition of high explosives, gave rise to an occasionally expressed view of World War I as “the chemists’ war”.

 

  • F) AIRCRAFT:  At the start of World War One, aircraft were very basic and crude. By the time World War One had ended, aircraft had become far more sophisticated differentiated into fighters, bombers and long-range bombers. The development of aircraft was stimulated by the war’s requirements, as was the way aircraft were actually used. At the start of the war in August 1914, British airmen were part of the British Army and commissioned officers had army ranks. By the end of the war in November 1918, the Royal Flying Corps no longer existed and was absorbed into the newly created Royal Air Force. This had its own command structure away from the army and introduced its own ranks.

     The first recorded powered flight was in 1903 when the Wright brothers flew their aircraft. The first powered crossing of the English Channel was by Louis Blèriot in 1909. Therefore it could only be expected that in 1914 aircraft remained remarkably crude. In the autumn of 1914 a new recruit to the Royal Flying Corps had a greater chance of being killed during training than during combat. When British aircraft took off from England to fly to bases in France for the first time in the war, navigation was based on map reading while in the air and, if the lack of clouds allowed, looking out for landmarks on the ground to guide the pilots.

    Initially aircraft were thought to be of little combat use. One unknown British general commented:

    “The airplane is useless for the purposes of war.”

  • G) TANKS : The tank had an interesting role in World War One. The tank was first used at the little known Battle of Flers. It was then used with less success at the Battle of the Somme. Though the tank was highly unreliable – as one would expect from a new machine – it did a great deal to end the horrors of trench warfare and brought back some mobility to the Western Front. The idea of the tank came from a development of farming vehicles that could cross difficult land with ease by using caterpillar tracks. However, the British army’s hierarchy was dominated by officers from the various cavalry regiments that existed. At the start of World War One, the first engagement between the British and Germans had involved cavalry near Mons. This seemed to emphasis the importance of such regiments. However, trench warfare had made the use of cavalry null and void. Cavalry engagements fought in mud proved very costly and from a military point of view, hopeless. Despite this seemingly obvious fact, senior military commanders were hostile to the use of armored vehicles, as they would have challenged the use of cavalry in the field.

Part 2:

Ideas for Stimulus:

Prisoner of War: There will be a small squadron of soldiers who have been captured and have no means of calling for help. They talk to each over as-if the next day will be their last and they open up to each over.

Pilot in a Gunship: Soldiers are in a gunship high up in the sky and use a remote control to shoot down the opposition with guilt residing as there is no counter force against them and how easy it is to kill while safely behind combat.

Sniper on a dangerous Spec-Ops mission: this involves a Marksman and a spotter. They are on a high vantage point in which looks over some enemy territory in which they’re mission is unclear to them as the militia are torturing villagers yet ‘high-command has told them to gather Intel and information, yet the spotter can’t just watch what had been happening and go home. He finds he needs to help them. The Marksman has done many operations like this before. He understands that he must try and do something to prevent higher casualties that won’t matter the the government’s officials by rests in the mind of soldiers.

Although these had all been good ideas to stem from, the group had gone from an original idea of focusing on the battle of the Somme concept. of an individual in considerable power or authority, ordering soldiers to their deaths.

Cue sheet for lights:

Start of performance

Begin with darkness

When all props are set, put up the red light only

When Josh finishes talking on the ground, dim the light down to pitch black

Dim up to white light when Josh and Eugene are sitting down beside the blocks

When Josh begins reading the letter, dim up to blue light only

When Josh finishes the letter, put up the white light only

Wait for everyone to leave the stage and dim down to black

Put up to blue when Amjad is centre stage.

Dim down blue when Amjad leaves the stage

When Eugene and Josh are on the floor, bring up the white light.

When Eugene begins his spoken word dim the light to red only

When he’s finished his spoken word, dim the light to pitch black

End of performance

Prep day :

We had come in to school at 10:15am to be briefed on what was due to happen. Soon after, we acted out our improvised scene and were given immediate feedback from our fellow peers and teachers on how we could improve our performance and acting/directing techniques. Then we all took part in group exercises in which we would be asked to somehow move to the other side of the room in the ‘wackiest’ way possible. Other instructions included “the lowest way possible to the left side of the room” etc. This ways to show how something can be executed in many different ways.

We had also focused on the matter of ‘Death’ on stage, and how it cannot be acted out initially, due to the fact that it would not look real and the audience would stop imagining that the story is actually happening and analyse the ‘corpse’ for signs of breathing or any sign of life and movement. We were instead taught how to utilize lighting techniques and subtle movement to showcase a death.

Day of Rehearsal : On the day before the performance we had brought our costumes to school and performed our scenes in front of a whole year of pupils.

I had really enjoyed using the different types of lighting used in order to change atmospheres. For instance, a red beam of light would indicate a key event, a white beam of light would indicate a normal setting in the present and a blue light meaning a spoken thought that is a monologue delivered directly towards the audience by a single character.

This is an example of the red beam being used for Josh’s character, Private Herbert Smith reading aloud a letter that would have been sent to his mother in order to reassure her of his well-being.

BredBwhite

Costume : 

My costume had consisted of my ‘Army’ cadets uniform that I had borrowed, seeing as it would have been difficult for the entire group to acquire all of the ‘World War One’ garments, —————————————————————————!

On this picture we have a good view of the attire worn on stage. As my character had a cocky, self obsessed lieutenant, he had an unbuttoned shirt and his sleeves rolled up. We had also thought it would look more war like if we had painted our faces with black paint. I had chosen to wear brown all terrain boots, seeing as we would be in the mud along the trenches of France. However, as we see with Josh’s character with the blue overalls it shows the Generals disliking of him, seeing as he has not supplied him with the correct equipment.

The General is also the only individual with body armor when he will not be anywhere near the front-line. This displays the selfish attitude of the officials during the war.

 

 

 

 

 

My Character, Lieutenant Rogers is very up of him,self and slightly self-obsessed. However in his spoken thought, he declares how he is actually scared of the situation that he has found himself in and that it is also visibly noticeable from the audience that he perhaps takes care of how he looks so that it distracts him from the real issues around him.

I had watched films like ‘Captain America : The winter soldier’ and ‘Fury’ in order to prepare for the role as I had needed to understand what it was like in those times.

 

Part 3:

What worked well?

What had worked well was that even though we had not been sure on what to do when a problem would occur, we had worked well and improvised as a team.

What didn’t work?

Using a play pistol as a prop for a gun as it makes it too unrealistic to the audience so we had decided to use an imaginary gun instead which had worked better.

What changes did you make throughout the development process that improved/focused your performance on its main driving question?

The changes that we had made had been taking away scenes as some parts of the story would derive from the main story-line so we had taken some away and it had then given us a chance to focus then on improving and advancing in other scenes.

How did the audience respond?

The audience had responded well because they had laughed at the more comedic scenes and we had all heard a healthy clap and cheer afterwards.

What would you do differently?

I would of perhaps gotten a more accurate costume for the ‘First World War’.

What did you learn?

I had learnt how efficient it is to perform a performance without a direct script with dialogue and more loosely restricted as it allowed the actors to relax and decide what and how the character would do and react to certain situations.

 

`The Equipment Used :

Lighting equipment was used to control atmosphere and mood, as said before.

High Performance Stage Light : Lighting equipment was used to control atmosphere and mood, as said before.

 

Camera used – Canon EOS 60D 18.0 MP DSLR Camera – 1080p : This was used to take some of the snapshots that will help to point out where we had made our mistakes and to also record our exam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Touching The Void : Chapter one.

In the start of chapter one in the book “Into The Void” by Joe Simpson, it takes us through the voyage of two avid explorers or climbers called Joe and Simon, and we are introduced to them in a tent amidst the Mountain Lakes of the Peruvian Andes.

Alongside our two antagonists, another character introduced from the start is the bewildered “Richard”, he is seemed to come off as quite accident prone as it says his most recent companion had been killed. However he does not know how to climb and this does not go down well with Joe, none the less, they invite him into the camp.

The Narrator, Joe describes his mutual affection for Simon and why they are both suited for each over in this trip for the voyage.

The weather had been unpredictable and therefore they had decided to not go through with the climb that day and had just decided to go exploring, amidst the mountain with Richard tagging along. They say that they will be back in a few days and head off leaving Richard back at base while they attempt Siula Grande.

They ascend their climb through the treacherous blizzard and whiteout, and have no other choice than to find sanctuary in a “snow-hole” like crevice.

Shakespeare Controlled Assessment.

skullifiedHow do the studied poets and Shakespeare use literary techniques to show how people respond to forces in the world over which they have no control.

Shakespeare alongside many other poets uses literary devices in order to reflect how characters or people react to forces, such as Fate in the seemingly twisted world around them. In the chosen poems: “On my first sonne”, “Do not go gentle into that good Night”, “A song in a storm”, “Dying of the Light” and extracts from Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”, all utilize the presence of death as they had all lost someone very close to them. I know this because from my own knowledge I can gather that Shakespeare had named the infamous play, “Hamlet” after his first son, named “Hamnet”, who had succumbed to the symptoms of the Bubonic Plague and eventually died. As most did at that time.

Shakespeare may had felt a lot of grief following his death as “Hamnet” was his only son, heir and individual who could carry on the Shakespeare name. As his daughter who would have not been entitled to the same gratification in the 16th century. The plague was almost impossible to evade as the sanitation in the 1600’s was vile and wretched, meaning it was only the inevitability that one in three people would catch it.

Ben Johnson’s son had also died from an illness, yet Johnson’s son had been presumably diagnosed as terminally ill from birth, as in his poem, “On my first sonne”, he mentions “Seven yeeres thou wert lent to me, and I thee pay”. This translates to his son being given life for seven years and now he has to deal with the grief. An extract from the monologue in Hamlet reads, “Thousand natural shocks that fleshy is heir to”. This means that throughout life your body will be introduced to shocks and pain that your body is to inherit almost as if everyone at some point in time is introduced to the suffering of life which Hamlet had gone through but Ben Johnson’s son did not as he had died young. Johnson is known for his tongue and cheek satirical poems, yet due to the death of his son, it had changed his writing momentarily which shows the severity of the depression and pain. However Dylan Thomas had lost his Father and this could give an alternate relationship from son to Father. His Father had died from old age (natural causes) and yet again there had never been a way in which to prevent this. Finally Rudyard Kipling’s loss had been the many comrades and soldiers who had died around him. Compared to the other poets mentioned, Kipling was not entirely close to the dead around him and therefore was not in depression as we can see in his poems, they are not direct towards a specific person or entity yet of describing the atmosphere of battle etc. He also stands out from Shakespeare, Ben Johnson etc. As his poems tend to give off a positive vibe that leaves the reader feeling uplifted and may have uplifted the morale of the fellow-men around him.

Whether there are small or significant differences between them,  all poets mentioned have something that they all have in common, whether it describes this in their poems or in general. Apart from themselves all being men, another similarity is that they have all lost someone close to them and it had been of no fault of their own, as the illnesses caught by Shakespeare’s son, Hamnet and Ben Johnson’s son, Benjamin, had been all terminal, and nothing could have been done to of prevented those deaths. Along side Dylan Thomas who’s father died from natural old age, which as we know is the most certain inevitable event during life. Soldiers dying in battle is also expected as it is fundamentally known that in battle there is a high risk of being killed, so therefore Rudyard Kipling could certainly not have prevented this.

They all know that they could not of prevented them being witness to loss, yet feel somehow guilty or portray this in their poems. This may just be grief towards the fact that what they once held close was taken from them.

Now looking at other similarities, I can say that even in other poems by other poets, there is a heavy use of metaphors. Metaphors help describe and give personality to a piece of text. The poet can explain, in detail how he would have liked the word to be used. For example “Hamlet was angry” could be emphasised with the use of a metaphor such as “Hamlet almost had fumes seeping out of his ears as he was visually infuriated”. This is more descriptive and helps the reader to understand the level of anger that Hamlet is undertaking.

A great metaphor in Hamlet is “For who would bear the whips and scorns of time”. I believe this means that through time, all will experience many different types of pain ( the fate of experiencing pain) such as mental and physical illness and maybe even spiritual like a family loss.

In Ben Johnson’s, On my first Sonne, ” Seven yeeres thou wert lent to me and I thee pay, Exacted by thy Fate, on the just day”. In this metaphor, Johnson views God as a banker or lender in which had lent him his son to come to earth. When it was time for his son to return with God, his son had died and exactly after seven years. Johnson had known that his son would be given back prior so it had been a loan in some sense.

“Do not go gentle into that good Night” is a poem written by Dylan Thomas, the use of metaphors is profound in the poem as the poet had been an avid reader of Shakespeare from a young age, which can be seen throughout his writings. There is a re-occurrence of light and time of day etc and they are metaphors for death as it explains a lifespan as if it were a day, specifically sunrise being birth and night being death. Seeming as the poem explains that it is sunset which would mean this person or entity is approaching death and is almost saying that you should accept death yet have your head held high This is exactly explained in the poem, “Old age should burn and rave at close of day” overall the poem’s fate is that death will come and the only choice you have is whether to embrace the inevitable or not.

“A song in a storm” is tattered with metaphors such as “The glimmering combers roll”, the abiding oceans fight” and “As our streaming bows rebuke Each billow’s baulked career”. The poem, hence the name is using a storm like setting of a sea to describe a battle, “The abiding oceans fight” or “By force of weather, not of war, in jeopardy we steer”. It is a good use of metaphor as a ocean can be wild and destructive with tidal waves and tsunami’s etc, but yet it can be calm and bearer of wondrous species of fish and coral life. Looking at the physical presentation of poem, the stanzas are much like waves in the sense that as a paragraph glorifies death and righteousness, it heaves back with a parting of the next paragraph and the reader is then hit with a new wave of metaphors and repetition.The sentence  “Be well assured that on our side The abiding oceans fight”, is quite comical as then ocean is thought to be against whoever dares to sail through it yet somehow, something that is treacherous and uncontrollable is on their side.Rudyard was present during the first world war so perhaps he uses these metaphors to display that the battlefield was chaotic and like an ocean, unpredictable.

Personification is used in poems to to give a human characteristic or quality to an object or entity that would not normally feel and think.

For instance, in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, there are many examples of this such as when Hamlet is questioning the solidarity of life and he says, “Currents turn awry”. Awry means for something to go off on an almost unexpected course, so maybe the word “currents” accompanies the word awry as, when in sea, the ocean and water can be unpredictable and therefore may alternate from calm to awry and can often feel that the sea had changed its mind and had wanted to make your journey hell. The use of personification with water is also present in “A song In a Storm” by Rudyard Kipling.

In Rudyard Kipling’s, “A song in a Storm”, it is tattered with uses of personification as he talks about the ocean being a metaphor for war and battle. For instance, “To welcome Fate’s discourtesy” as it is saying that fate is somewhat inconsiderate of people lives and well beings, by inducing them to pain and suffering. The poem is positive and was probably used at that time for propaganda as the government had needed more people to enlist into the army and this was a good technique to make the readers believe that they had owed something to their “country”.

“Dying of the Light” is an example of personification present in Dylan Thomas’s ‘Do not Go Gentle Into that Good Light’ as light does not die, as it is not alive and an entity as it is portrayed throughout the poem rigorously. As the poem is based around fighting against the inevitability of death as a a flame can be calm and elegant with wave like movements or aggressive and primal like a scorching torch. Fate is present in this poem spiritually almost as the poem is a voice in denial of almost “growing old gracefully” or with reluctance to accept departure from the ground beneath us. “Curse, Bless me now with your false tears, I pray”, This is a very powerful collection of words as it describes everyone as being doomed with a time of death even before you are born. The “Fierce Tear” is powerful because the entity is crying because of anger not sadness and really expresses the emotional image being as it is not passing  across sorrow for the fact that he is leaving, yet angry almost at “God” that he has to go through with this transaction in the first place and that there is no choice as it is decided before birth.

Personification is present in Ben Johnson’s, “On My First Son”, as “O have so soon ‘scap’d world’s and flesh’s rage”. As he is describing “flesh” as life and that “flesh’s rage” is all the troubles and evil that occur in life. He uses this sentence to describe how his son dyeing before a ripe age had prevented him from experiencing the pain and suffering which occurs throughout a life time.

Rhythm in poetry is the method of describing audible features of a poem. Metre is the basic rhythmic structure of verses or lines in a verse. Many traditional verse forms utilize a specific verse metre, or a certain set of metres alternating in a particular order. The study and the actual use of metres and forms of versification are both known as prosody.

In Shakespeare’s’ Hamlet, and many works, all have metre and rhythm present, as the actors would often perform with a step in their feet to pronounce the beat(Pardon the pun). For instance in Act 1 Scene 2, there is a good representation of metre and rhythm with iambic pentameter.

O that this too too solid flesh would melt,Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew! Or that the Everlasting had not fix’d His canon ’gainst self -slaughter! O God! O God! The iambic pentameter consists of ten syllables in each line, and has stressed and unstressed syllables. The following letters are what the iambic beat consists of, “Ba” is followed by “Bum“. The Iambic pentameter is said to be of the same beat as a heartbeat or a “Tick-Tock” of a clock.

It is present in Ben Johnson first two lines of “On My First Sonne” that there is rhyme and metre. The words “joy” and “lov’d boy” both rhyme and both appear at the end of both lines.

“Farewell, thou child of my right hand, and joy;

My sin was too much hope of thee, lov’d boy.

This appears frequently throughout the poem, as Ben Johnson had been perhaps influenced by Shakespeare and had both lived roughly around the same time period of the 1600’s, so the style of poetry would have iambic pentameter and metre etc.

In “Do not go gentle into that good night”, Dylan Thomas also shares a connection with Shakespeare as to end the Iambic Pentameter they will both use a repetition of a word i.e. Rage Rage against the Dying Of The Light”. And Shakespeare’s, “self -slaughter! O God! O God! The physical structure of the poem is in a pattern also as the “Stanzas” are each three lines each, except the last, yet the first two lines of every stanza are longer than the last.

Rudyard Kipling’s poem “A Song In A Storm”, has many types of rhythm and metre. For example, “Be well assured, though wave and wind Have mightier blows in store,That we who keep the watch assigned, Must stand to it the more”. The words, “Have mightier blows in store” and ” Must stand to it the more” both rhyme and have similar phonics. I.E. “Store” and “More”.

Iambic pentameter is also present, “No matter though our decks be swept, And mast and timber crack, We can make good all loss except, The loss of turning back. So, ‘twixt these Devils and our deep Let courteous trumpets sound, To welcome Fate’s discourtesy
Whereby it will be found, etc.

The studied poets and especially Shakespeare use literary techniques to show how people respond to forces in the world over which they have no control, as with the help of metaphors and metre, they are able to talk about their feelings on fate and how it has affected their life. For instance, they are moved by the loss of something close to them and may find writing a poem about it, healing and even maybe comforting. They make subtle references to God also which they could often blame for their chosen fate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

My Working Record- The Reflection.

After viewing my acting in my couple scenes I will review and give self-criticism on my own and others work.

In “The Exit Visa” I had thought that there were many mistakes I had made. Such as me and Jose, who plays Ajax should have been standing closer to the camera as it would have then been easier to see the facial expressions and co-ordinated hand movements. I also could have projected my voice and maybe slightly deepened the voice as it would have been more comfortable to imagine Achilles on stage rather than seeing myself portraying Achilles as a role. However I did change the tone of my voice with everything I said instead of sounding mono-tone. My costume had looked convincing and I did spend a lot of time managing the correct and practical items in which a battle-hardened warrior would wear. So overall I believe that what I had had to work with, I and my co-actors had done well.

I need to work on my facial emotions and expression’s as I was slightly worried and stressed on the outcome of my performance that I should have been focused on actually doing it.

I met up with the intent

The clothes that I had wore was a White long-sleeve t-shirt which would also have probably kept you warm on cold nights and cool in the heat as it is white. Biker cargo’s as in a previous scene he was mentioned dragging Hectors corpse on a motorbike so this gave me a hint as to what he would wear. In scene 9 I had also worn a Flak jacket, which would protect the wearer from falling shrapnel or even prevent bullets from penetrating the vital organs, alas if there was only protection for his ankles. Brown boots for rough terrain and a Green Bomber bomber jacket which is very practical as hence the name “Bomber” they are what the air-force wore during time of war. A cool thing which is included in the jacket from ‘TK MAXX’ was an inside pocket which unzips and I was able to utilize this in Act 2 Scene 10 when I am passing Brisies her document’s and plane ticket.

Body Language- In scene 9 I used relaxed hand gestures and quirky smiles as The other character Phoenix had been my old friend and I wanted to show the viewers that I was comfortable with him. The pouring off coffee was beneficial to the scene as it had shown a physical and mental change for Achilles. With so much stress on his mind, there is not time to sleep, no time to stop and think. He drinks the caffeine to keep awake as there is the guilt riding on his soldiers for Patroclus’s death and his hope of leaving behind and abandoning the death and suffering of war and battle.

Method Acting- To get into the role of the ‘Greek Hero’, Achilles it wasn’t as hard as I had read on an article about Stanislavsky’s theory of putting yourself in the characters shoes.

Text analysis

In the text of Hamlet’s, to be or not to be, I had chosen the sentence “For who would bear the whips and scorns of time”. Hamlet is questioning whether his life is his to take or rather whether fate would do it for him. Throughout the text Hamlet talks about physical weapons yet only use them in a metaphorical way, such as “For who would bear the whips” and “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune”. The Shakespeare had chosen the word “Scorn” to almost describe the negative events of contempt that had taken place In Hamlets life. In all, Hamlet is almost being sarcastic in the fact that he bears the whips and scorns of time, so he creates or is at least partly responsible for the hate witnessed by himself and others in his life.

 

There is also another example of something like this used in the play, “show me the steep an thorny way to heaven”. This is quoted from ophelia, who in which may be a key contributor towards hamlet’s epiphany. Ophelia shows much  anger and frustration towards her Brothers and Fathers petty argument on the subject of her relationship with  Hamlet. The quote  explains life as steep and thorny, which I believe is a very descriptive use of metaphor.

Hamlet Act V Scene II

As a dramatic climax unfolds Laertes and Hamlet are issued a fight or a duel between each over. The King has rigged the fight for Horatio to win and he has done this by lathering poison in Hamlets chalice and on the tip of Horatio’s sword. This backfires as The Queen drinks from Hamlet’s poisoned goblet and dies a slow and meaningless death. Hamlet is struck with the tip and has venom coursing through his bloodstream. They swap swords and by luck Horatio is also struck. They are both poisoned and Laertes declares that the King is guilty of murder and at this moment in time, Hamlet strikes his chance and impales the King. Hamlet is almost happy to die at the end of the play as his revenge had been fulfilled and his soul was almost at peace.

Act V Scene I

Hamlet and Horatio interrupt the two gravediggers preparing Ophelia’s grave and for the funeral. The Gravediggers have banter between them, and talk the circumstances of Ophelia’s death. She had killed herself willingly and this is not a very christian thing to do as it is profound upon.Then the funeral begins and during the procession with everybody seated, Claudius, The Queen and Rozencrants and Guildenstern, Hamlet burst out in ore and anger out among everyone and the mourners. Horatio confesses his love for Ophelia and Hamlet is enraged and disgusted as he believes that his love for Ophelia is much much stronger. Horatio gets to the extent of diving into the burial which seems Pathetic.

Hamlet Act IV Scene VII

The King has a private word with Laertes. With the new found knowledge of Hamlets return he confides in Laertes and explains to him that he was the one that had slain his Father and that now is the time to get his revenge. He riles up Laertes by simply saying profound statements such as how he does not love his father and how Hamlet still lives, carelessly. To add on to the hate that is currently bottling up, Hamlets’ mother, the Queen brings the grim news of Ophelia’s death. The Queen ant agonizingly explains with every crumb the details of Ophelia’s death.